Photo credit: Calvin Ochieng/The Dignity Project
We have seen through our work that upholding dignity is vital in international development. But what does “dignity” really mean? The team at IDinsight’s new Dignity Initiative have been working to define it and draw out some implications from that definition in our new research brief and longer working paper.
Dignity has intrinsic value; it is important in its own right and valued globally – we should be respectful of people’s dignity because of that inherent value. In addition, treating people in a way that respects their dignity helps advance other outcomes that improve lives and wellbeing – things practitioners in aid and development deeply care about.
Despite its importance, there is still little practical agreement on how to define dignity and how to operationalize it. Without these components, as well as a more nuanced understanding of how to incentivize approaches and behavior that respect people’s dignity, we remain in a world of rhetoric rather than action.
Our definition: “A trait universal to all humans, which is inalienable, inherent, and unearned. Recognising the dignity of a person requires us to treat them in a way that respects their dignity. When we fail to show that respect for dignity, the disrespected individual can appeal to the wider society for redress.”
We call this our ‘workhorse’ definition – it’s not perfect, but we think it is practical. There are a lot of concepts packed into that definition; they are discussed more fully in the research brief.
Dignity shows up all across social and economic development. We call this the ‘dignity chain’. It shows the relationship between the groups who fund, design, and deliver aid, and the groups who end up receiving the aid. At the interface of this interaction, those groups receiving aid may or may not have respectful experiences. In the full working paper, we report the results of three experiments that provide supporting evidence for the relationships we illustrate in this diagram.
This evidence drawn from studies of nonprofits, donors, and Kenyans leads us to four big conclusions:
We believe that there are three pathways to showing respect for people’s dignity: representation, agency and equality. These seem to show up across different traditions of dignity around the world.
Right now, IDinsight’s Dignity initiative is developing a method for ‘Dignity Audits’ to help organizations identify where in their process they are upholding or breaking their dignity promises. We have developed and validated a survey measure that assesses people’s dignity experiences. We’ll be publishing lessons from five organizations that have done a great job building cultures of dignity. And in September, we are convening scholars from around the world to lay out a research agenda to support this work. If you would like to keep up to date with developments across the dignity community, sign up to our newsletter here.
It’s easy for our sector to talk about upholding dignity but we want to make certain that this leads to real impact on people’s lives resulting from their perspectives being heard.
To do so, we must begin with clarity about what upholding dignity means, and about how (dis)respect appears. These concepts provide a foundation for all the work done by IDinsight’s Dignity Initiative.
26 July 2021
14 January 2022
26 March 2020
4 December 2020