Briefing rural communities on the advantages of the Unified Beneficiary Registry in Malawi.
Photo shared by Matthias Rompel. November 2021
Government leaders are often required to make many high-stakes decisions every day. In an ideal world, all these decisions would be based on evidence but there are a number of real-world constraints that often get in the way of using data for decision-making. IDinsight’s embedded learning partnerships provide timely, flexible, and responsive support to government leaders by answering important, urgent questions and helping to build a culture of and system for data and evidence use.
In this blog, I share with you my experience working with the government of Malawi through a multi-year Learning Partnership where IDinsight was embedded within the Ministry of Gender, Children, Disability, and Social Welfare, to enhance the social impact of several government programs.
First, here is the context within which government learning partnerships operate:
From implementing the Malawi Learning Partnership, we discovered five things that can set you up for success working in a long-term partnership with governments. Here are our top takeaways:
Proposed solutions must be grounded in local realities. There isn’t a “one-size-fits-all” approach. IDinsight’s engagement was made more effective by:
Governments often operate under resource and political constraints. It is important to understand the political economy, the influence of funding institutions, and the strategic direction of your government partner (especially in the face of national leadership changes). Sometimes, subtle advocacy is required for other stakeholders to help drive the impact forward. For instance, after we worked with the government to pilot and evaluate a CashPlus Linkages initiative – providing add-on social services at cash transfer collection points – in one district (Thyolo), we presented our results to all stakeholders involved in the Social Cash Transfer Program. We saw an increased interest among funding organizations which led to the rollout of this impactful Linkages Project to two additional districts, reaching a further 24,000 households.
A Learning Partnership is unique in the way progress is experienced. Unlike projects with a fixed scope and timeline, pathways to impact in long-term flexible Learning Partnerships evolve and more often than not, are multi-dimensional. The success of a Learning Partnership should therefore be measured beyond reach and ultimate decisions influenced. The time it takes to get ideas and recommendations considered, accepted, incorporated, and applied is usually much longer, but once ideas are adopted and owned by the government, the impact follows quickly. Small and soft successes along the way compound to improve processes and systems. The Malawi Learning Partnership required several years to show meaningful results in system improvements and policy change and of course complete adoption and use beyond the life of the Learning Partnership. To keep the team motivated, we celebrated, documented, and reflected on the small wins regularly. We realized the learning partnership had achieved intended and unintended effects and considered the progress as part of the impact.
For lasting impact in a Learning Partnership, there is value in generating evidence for policy making. However, a higher impact can be achieved if support is extended into program implementation. Policy questions are often longer-term. Policy implementation, though, can be influenced in the shorter term in a more significant way. For example, as the government was figuring out Covid-19 policy responses and guidance, IDinsight’s technical support on the Covid-19 Urban Cash Initiative helped the government to refine its approach to designing rapid responses to social protection during emergencies by effectively strengthening data quality. Some of the quick wins interventions such as the Light Touch Add-Ons pilot have gone to enhance longer-term policies. The Malawi Learning Partnership managed to strike this kind of balance by contributing to broader policy actions and strengthening the delivery and implementation of programs under the policy.
As IDinsight implemented its workstreams, there was an emphasis on transferring skills and ownership to the government right away. To be effective, capacity building should be embedded from end to end: from the process of co-creating to generating the evidence to engaging users. Training should be a core part of the Learning Partnership and must be delivered both formally and informally with the understanding that you will hand over ownership and support. This has been effective in the Malawi Learning Partnership where the Department of Planning and Research (DPR) and IDinsight worked alongside each other to design rapid assessments during emergencies to help with quick improvements to the Covid-19 Urban Cash Initiative. After a joint, post-distribution study, the DPR took ownership and completed subsequent post-disbursement monitoring (PDM) exercises, but also implement insightful regular (quarterly) PDMs for its normal social cash transfer program.
Understanding how your government partner functions and adapting internal operating procedures to their ever-changing environment is what increases your impact potential and results in building a culture of evidence-based decision-making. Recognizing the broader ecosystem within which your partner operates should also inform your approach and anchor your recommendations in their reality – increasing the probability of implementation, and therefore, enhancing your social impact.
I’m deeply grateful for the contributions, recommendations, and reviews of my colleagues at IDinsight who made this blog post possible. I am especially thankful to Frida Njogu-Ndongwe, Krishna Ramesh, and the IDinsight Strategic Communications team.
We collaborate with government leaders to develop and roll out data-driven policy solutions aligned with their priorities and within their budgets.
28 November 2019
5 December 2019
26 July 2021
28 January 2021