The long walk from the toilet stall to the handwashing station in a classroom in Zamboanga del Norte ©IDinsight/Nhu Le
Handwashing Policy Brief - 610 KB
Handwashing one-pager - 990 KB
UNICEF first began working with IDinsight to identify why their WASH program wasn’t working effectively. In addition, UNICEF had an opportunity to work with the Department of Education to improve children’s handwashing at scale across the Philippines — thereby significantly reducing the likelihood of children dying or getting sick from preventable diseases.
In the first two phases of the engagement, IDinsight evaluated a different intervention aimed at increasing handwashing through a teacher-led behavior change program, but found that it didn’t increase handwashing rates enough to justify scale up.
Given the exciting results seen from behavioral “nudges” built into the handwashing environment in other contexts, we suggested that UNICEF and DepEd adapt and test this intervention in the Philippines. Working together, we adapted the nudges to address the primary barriers to handwashing among children in the Philippines, which our previous studies had found to be forgetfulness and more broadly, a lack of habit formation.
School children in the Philippines suffer from a high burden of preventable diseases, with hygiene deficiencies identified as a common cause. Handwashing with soap is considered to be one of the most effective measures to reduce respiratory tract infections and diarrhea and prevent the transmission of infectious diseases. IDinsight’s previous research in Philippine public schools found that independent handwashing with soap (iHWWS) rates are below 10%, even when adequate facilities are available. But targeted behavior change campaigns conducted by teachers did not lead to meaningful changes in handwashing behavior, despite strong implementation.
Therefore, IDinsight designed and evaluated an intervention to instill the habit of regular handwashing by pupils in Philippineschools. Our goal was to identify a successful intervention that could be incorporated into the national WASH in Schools policy that directly impacts over-40-million children in the Philippines who attend public schools.1
IDinsight work included:
Specifically, we evaluated the effectiveness of four nudges:
We found that the low-cost handwashing nudges drove longer-lasting, “sticky” behavior change in independent handwashing with soap after toilet use by pupils. Four months after nudges were installed, we found that students’ handwashing rates increased by 17 percentage points compared to students in schools without the nudges. This is equivalent to an increase of 148 percent. The nudges also led to improved access to functional handwashing facilities. Compared to students who didn’t receive nudges, students in schools with nudges were slightly more likely to have access to a functional handwashing facility near toilets, and 38 percent more likely to have access to a facility with soap. This suggested that the contextual and visual cues we installed helped trigger habit formation.
Given nudge installations cost relatively little ($60 USD per school), we recommended that the Department of Education scale up school-based nudges in elementary schools that have minimum WASH infrastructure in the Philippines as a part of its WinS policy. The recommended infrastructure requirements are: functional toilets, functional handwashing stations, water availability at least some hours of the day (running or stored), and dedicated school funds for soap. We also recommended that the nudges, which can improve handwashing rates after toilet use, be utilized in conjunction with other infection prevention and mitigation measures to ensure a safer environment in schools for students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Based on our findings, DepEd is including the nudges as part of a recommended package of infrastructure improvements for eligible schools when they reopen after COVID closures.
15 May 2020
21 May 2020
15 August 2020
6 November 2019
We work with international agencies to ensure their agendas and operations are founded on the best available data and evidence.
26 May 2020
1 April 2021
26 June 2020